←back to thread

128 points darthShadow | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
concerndc1tizen ◴[] No.42812414[source]
If you don't like it, then why don't you use a different provider?

If you want free stuff, is your strategy to smear them into giving you more free stuff?

Storage, compute, and traffic, isn't free. You've been the beneficiary of charity for years.

Yes, the open source community has relied on this implicit charity as a parasite, by exploiting whatever free services they could. And now we're paying the price, as you say, by having DockerHub as the default provider.

My suggestion is therefore that we need independent solutions, that are fully funded as a charity, and stop relying on freemium services from corporations that fundamentally don't care about the public good.

replies(13): >>42812438 #>>42812465 #>>42812483 #>>42812503 #>>42812530 #>>42812541 #>>42812566 #>>42812595 #>>42812600 #>>42812673 #>>42812938 #>>42814023 #>>42816357 #
bayindirh ◴[] No.42812566[source]
You're framing this wrong.

They don't whine because they didn't get DSOS status this year. They are confused because they didn't get an answer.

They want communication, not free cookies.

replies(1): >>42812655 #
concerndc1tizen ◴[] No.42812655[source]
> we were preparing for our annual DSOS renewal. This process is abysmal, there's no way to apply to roll over membership, or even a renewal process per se, you have to reapply from scratch every year using the same badly-designed form ...

It sounds more to me like those who run DockerHub aren't that interested in giving away free service.

replies(2): >>42812755 #>>42812944 #
1. skywhopper ◴[] No.42812944[source]
You’d think they’d at least try to sell to people who are asking for their services.