←back to thread

212 points arjvik | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
acheong08 ◴[] No.42733994[source]
I don't understand why anyone would use passwordless disk encryption. It just seems inherently vulnerable, especially with the threat model of physical compromise.

Entering a password on boot isn't even that much work

replies(20): >>42734012 #>>42734073 #>>42734132 #>>42734171 #>>42734304 #>>42734370 #>>42734375 #>>42734397 #>>42734516 #>>42734734 #>>42734841 #>>42734892 #>>42734925 #>>42735445 #>>42736160 #>>42739068 #>>42740673 #>>42741392 #>>42742256 #>>42749423 #
surajrmal ◴[] No.42749423[source]
Full disk encryption is just inherently a flawed approach compared to per file encryption. Androids approach of only protecting user data with behind the password and otherwise using a separate encryption key to allow the os to boot to the lock screen and some apps to run (eg alarms) is a more user friendly approach. Unfortunately we don't seem to have that sortve option available to us with desktop OS.
replies(1): >>42751078 #
1. betaby ◴[] No.42751078[source]
> Unfortunately we don't seem to have that sortve option available to us with desktop OS.

As I understand MacOS uses per file encryption on AFS.