←back to thread

508 points zdw | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.677s | source
Show context
klik99 ◴[] No.42743428[source]
"If you want to try it, be aware that it requires Intel Pentium 166MHz or above."

Made me laugh. Fun article, also really love the genre of "bored smart person goes too deep on something that the end result is obvious by common sense but proving it requires surprising amount of ingenuity and scrappiness"

replies(4): >>42743506 #>>42743514 #>>42743529 #>>42748175 #
fishstock25 ◴[] No.42743514[source]
Totally agree.

And a great example that truth is complicated, expensive and uncomfortable. It's much easier to postulate an evil nation-state entity with a bad plan (without evidence) than to dig through the thicket of this article. It's much cheaper as well, certainly in terms of time and knowhow. And it's also much more comfortable to claim you're the victim and have uncovered a conspiracy, rather than realize this was just the result of the patchwork typical of engineering.

Kudos to the author.

replies(3): >>42743569 #>>42743630 #>>42747553 #
1. pammf ◴[] No.42747553[source]
Truth lies somewhere in between. It's also a generalization to think everything related to the “evil-nation” postulation is nothing beyond a conspiracy theory. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Edit: quoted evil-nation since it’s a debatable term usually applied to any country not politically or culturally aligned with some intelligence activity presence.

replies(2): >>42749453 #>>42749633 #
2. lazide ◴[] No.42749453[source]
Fun considering the history too [https://www.risidata.com/index.php?/Database/Detail/cia-troj...]
3. fishstock25 ◴[] No.42749633[source]
> Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Correct. Not more, not less. Question is what the default assumption is. With enough BS thrown around, the public seems to tend to tilt to "something is fishy" without any (non-debunked) evidence having ever been presented. Doesn't mean it never will be, but until then, a lot of debunked falsehoods shouldn't create more bias than just silence. Sadly, something always sticks.

replies(1): >>42754878 #
4. lazide ◴[] No.42754878[source]
fundamentally, it’s a ‘liberal’ (assume good intent/turn the other cheek) vs ‘conservative’ (cover your ass) approach. In the literal, not political meaning.

With enough problems, enough people get burned that of course this is where it goes.