←back to thread

102 points crescit_eundo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.393s | source
Show context
aredox ◴[] No.42741439[source]
>In the 1860s, Charles Baudelaire bemoaned what we might now call doomscrolling: [...] The poet’s revulsion was widely shared in 19th-century France. Amid rapid increases in circulation, newspapers were depicted as a virus or narcotic responsible for collective neurosis, overexcitement and lowered productivity.

On one hand, one could think "oh, the current social network bashing is just the same doom and gloom reaction to more communication, it will pass".

On the other hand, if you know well the period, the newspapers of the time - which were closer to the tabloids of today, but worse - did a lot to stir hatred of foreigners, of Jews, of Poor, and contributed massively in causing wars, colonialism and pogroms.

Emile Zola published "J'accuse !" in a newspaper, but it was newspapers who stirred rabid antisemitism everywhere.

replies(7): >>42741577 #>>42742305 #>>42742615 #>>42743062 #>>42743070 #>>42744093 #>>42745186 #
1. pessimizer ◴[] No.42742305[source]
I still can't get over the fact that there were Dreyfusard and anti-Dreyfusard bicycle racing newspapers.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_V%C3%A9lo

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/L'Auto

The anti-Dreyfusards won, put the Dreyfusards out of business by starting the Tour de France, and eventually went on to support Vichy.

edit: https://blog.nli.org.il/en/tour_de_france/