←back to thread

102 points crescit_eundo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
scandox ◴[] No.42740468[source]
Interesting article but unfortunately, as is often the case with serious literary folk talking about technology, I find his concluding observations (hopes) about augmented books completely unconvincing as well as vague.

>> The prospect of paper-based augmented books also holds out the possibility of revolutionary combinations of text, image and sound that would recast the boundaries of literary art.

Sounds like a solution in search of a problem, or worse - the sort of kidutainment geegaws you find in modern libraries.

replies(3): >>42741349 #>>42742681 #>>42743103 #
1. cf100clunk ◴[] No.42741349[source]
> ''sort of kidutainment geegaws''

Or rather as special case learning tools that would gather dust, I suspect.