(pubpeer.com)

159 points picture | 1 comments | 16 Jan 25 17:24 UTC | HN request time: 0.216s | source

Show context

snowwrestler ◴[16 Jan 25 19:33 UTC] No.42729812[source]▶

There is so little content and context to this link that it is essentially flame war bait in a non-expert forum like HN.

replies(1): >>42735461 #

netsharc ◴[17 Jan 25 09:00 UTC] No.42735461[source]▶

>>42729812 #

I smell this too, especially with the editorialized HN title that contains the word "mRNA".

replies(1): >>42740242 #

1. picture ◴[17 Jan 25 16:56 UTC] No.42740242[source]▶

>>42735461 #

The title was edited by supposedly HN moderators after I posted it. I actually ran into this youtube channel and thought it was very interesting, since I didn't realize academia seems to make so many mistakes all the time. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42728742

↑

Comment on 2015 mRNA paper suggests data re-used in different contexts