←back to thread

Is the world becoming uninsurable?

(charleshughsmith.substack.com)
478 points spking | 4 comments | 17 Jan 25 00:32 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
tobyhinloopen ◴[17 Jan 25 07:13 UTC] No.42734903[source]▶
American, living in area prone to natural disasters: "Is the WHOLE WORLD becoming uninsurable?"

The answer is obviously "no" since there are other parts of the world that don't live on a hurricane highway nor build houses made from firewood in an area prone to wildfires.

replies(22): >>42735049 #>>42735252 #>>42735436 #>>42736011 #>>42736604 #>>42736730 #>>42737082 #>>42737199 #>>42737348 #>>42737687 #>>42738099 #>>42738455 #>>42738961 #>>42740444 #>>42740756 #>>42741668 #>>42741813 #>>42742051 #>>42742463 #>>42743561 #>>42744077 #>>42744352 #
Over2Chars ◴[17 Jan 25 11:53 UTC] No.42736604[source]▶
I would assume that earthquake insurance in japan is a reasonable model for "world insurance".

It looks like it's a reinsurance program:

https://www.mof.go.jp/english/policy/financial_system/earthq...

So, I think the answer is "no".

replies(1): >>42737204 #
tzs ◴[17 Jan 25 13:17 UTC] No.42737204[source]▶
Japan is probably not a good comparison for home insurance because houses in Japan typically only have a 20 to 30 year lifespan. After that they are usually torn down and a new house is built.
replies(2): >>42737268 #>>42737705 #
UniverseHacker ◴[17 Jan 25 14:16 UTC] No.42737705[source]▶
Why would anyone tear down a 20 year old house? Where I live the houses are 80-100 years old and they’re better built and nicer to live in than most newer homes.
replies(3): >>42737813 #>>42737901 #>>42738314 #
1. skywhopper ◴[17 Jan 25 14:27 UTC] No.42737813{3}[source]▶
You could Google it and find out.
replies(2): >>42737993 #>>42738115 #
2. UniverseHacker ◴[17 Jan 25 14:43 UTC] No.42737993[source]▶
I could but I won’t… do you think I asked that question because I urgently need accurate data on Japanese housing? Why does anyone join forums, or discuss things with friends in real life when they could just Google things?
3. tenebrisalietum ◴[17 Jan 25 14:55 UTC] No.42738115[source]▶
Retire this meme. Google sucks now.
replies(1): >>42745282 #
4. Over2Chars ◴[18 Jan 25 02:31 UTC] No.42745282[source]▶
now?