←back to thread

258 points signa11 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.215s | source
Show context
kirubakaran ◴[] No.42732804[source]
> A major project will discover that it has merged a lot of AI-generated code

My friend works at a well-known tech company in San Francisco. He was reviewing his junior team member's pull request. When asked what a chunk of code did, the team member matter-of-factly replied "I don't know, chatgpt wrote that"

replies(16): >>42733064 #>>42733126 #>>42733357 #>>42733510 #>>42733737 #>>42733790 #>>42734461 #>>42734543 #>>42735030 #>>42735130 #>>42735456 #>>42735525 #>>42735773 #>>42736703 #>>42736792 #>>42737483 #
alisonatwork ◴[] No.42734461[source]
I have heard the same response from junior devs and external contractors for years, either because they copied something from StackOverflow, or because they copied something from a former client/employer (popular one in China), or even because they just uncritically copied something from another piece of code in the same project.

From the point of view of these sorts of developers they are being paid to make the tests go green or to make some button appear on a page that kindasorta does something in the vague direction of what was in the spec, and that's the end of their responsibility. Unused variables? Doesn't matter. Unreachable code blocks? Doesn't matter. Comments and naming that have nothing to do with the actual business case the code is supposed to be addressing? Doesn't matter.

I have spent a lot of time trying to mentor these sorts of devs and help them to understand why just doing the bare minimum isn't really a good investment in their own career not to mention it's disrespectful of their colleagues who now need to waste time puzzling through their nonsense and eventually (inevitably) fixing their bugs... Seems to get through about 20% of the time. Most of the rest of the time these folks just smile and nod and continue not caring, and companies can't afford the hassle of firing them, then you open LinkedIn years later and turns out somehow they've failed up to manager, architect or executive while you're still struggling along as a code peasant who happens to take pride in their work.

Sorry, got a little carried away. Anywho, the point is LLMs are just another tool for these folks. It's not new, it's just worse now because of the mixed messaging where executives are hyping the tech as a magical solution that will allow them to ship more features for less cost.

replies(14): >>42734514 #>>42734610 #>>42734635 #>>42734989 #>>42735105 #>>42735171 #>>42735362 #>>42735765 #>>42735948 #>>42736401 #>>42736870 #>>42736880 #>>42737897 #>>42738468 #
redeux ◴[] No.42736880[source]
> Most of the rest of the time these folks just smile and nod and continue not caring, and companies can't afford the hassle of firing them, then you open LinkedIn years later and turns out somehow they've failed up to manager, architect or executive while you're still struggling along as a code peasant who happens to take pride in their work.

I’ve heard this sentiment several times over the years and what I think a lot of people don’t realize is that they’re just playing a different game than you. Their crappy code is a feature not a bug because they’re expending the energy on politics rather than coding. In corporations politics is a form a work, but it’s not work that many devs want to do. So people will say the uncaring dev is doing poor work, but really they’re just not seeing the real work being done.

I’m not saying this is right or wrong, it’s just an observation. Obviously this isn’t true for everyone who does a poor job, but if you see that person start climbing the ladder, that’s the reason.

replies(1): >>42737556 #
1. stcroixx ◴[] No.42737556[source]
The kind of work you're describing doesn't benefit the company, it benefits the individual. It's not what they were hired to do. The poor quality code they produce can be a net negative when it causes bugs, maintenance issues, etc. I think it's always the right choice to boot such a person from any company once they've been identified.