←back to thread

244 points benbreen | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
bglazer ◴[] No.42727042[source]
Nice article about artifacts that make the past more immediate, that allow us to connect our experiences to people hundreds or thousands of years ago.

My favorite example is the writings of Onfim, who was a little boy in the 1200s in present day Russia whose scribbling and homework were exquisitely preserved on birch bark fragments. It’s so immediately recognizable as a little boy’s endearing doodles about knights and imaginary beasts, yet its 800 years old.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onfim

replies(9): >>42727316 #>>42728389 #>>42731172 #>>42731457 #>>42733035 #>>42733709 #>>42736732 #>>42738296 #>>42740440 #
zehaeva ◴[] No.42731457[source]
Similarly, when I read Meditations by Marcus Aurelius I was struck by how normal everything seemed. While he was an Emperor the everyday banality of what he talked about going through 2,000 years ago was amazing.

Humans really haven't changed that much at all.

replies(3): >>42731707 #>>42733725 #>>42734287 #
whenc ◴[] No.42733725[source]
We come mentally of age when we discover that the great minds of the past, whom we have patronized, are not less intelligent than we are because they happen to be dead -- Cyril Connolly, The Unquiet Grave
replies(1): >>42736605 #
1. alexvoda ◴[] No.42736605[source]
Does that(the patronization) happen frequently? I far more frequently witness people lionizing people of the past in all sorts of benign and malign ways.
replies(1): >>42744181 #
2. cout ◴[] No.42744181[source]
I wonder how often this happens and we _don't_ recognize it.