←back to thread

I ditched the algorithm for RSS

(joeyehand.com)
744 points DearNarwhal | 1 comments | 16 Jan 25 12:18 UTC | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
bluGill ◴[16 Jan 25 19:11 UTC] No.42729542[source]▶
A good algorithm is a good thing. However what a good algorithm is for me is often different from what it is for those who maintain them. Outrage gets attention and sometimes it is needed, but there is a level of too much, and also a lot of outrage unfairly represents the issues and so it makes me mad even though if I understood the details I wouldn't be mad just concerned.

I want an algorithm that surfaces things of interest to me, then says "you have seen it all, go outside" (with an option of if I'm confined to a hospital bed to go on). Algorithm maintainers want me to keep scrolling for more ad dollars.

replies(11): >>42729694 #>>42730030 #>>42730343 #>>42731465 #>>42732223 #>>42732697 #>>42733474 #>>42733961 #>>42735114 #>>42764093 #>>42764671 #
1. lrem ◴[17 Jan 25 07:58 UTC] No.42735114[source]▶
You seem to be behind on English as spoken. From what I can reconstruct:

Algorithm (n) - a secretive set of systems, procedures and data that Big Tech uses to maliciously manipulate unsuspecting general public. Example usage: "Algorithm-free music discovery app for DJs"

I'm not joking, that example usage is taken from a live example.