←back to thread

147 points rbanffy | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
chrisbrandow ◴[] No.42727218[source]
Assuming the energy input is atmospheric warmth, then the real question is what volume of ammonia can you produce with this device per acre? Then how does that amount of captured energy compare with wind/solar in the same area?

Otherwise, you’re just better off, producing electricity from one of those sources, or producing ammonia, using electricity from one of those sources, after accounting for losses in the various processes of course.

replies(2): >>42727420 #>>42728135 #
smaudet ◴[] No.42728135[source]
Sibling commenters mention industrial uses, sustainability means far more than just cars or electricity, part of why the focus on electric/cars is so short-sighted (never mind the issues electricity distribution brings to the table)...

But for cars/electricity, this is potentially excellent news (assuming longevity and cost of the operating equipment). The distribution costs are much lower than Hydrogen, and it could be used easily to power existing Hydrogen fleets. I'd wager this even makes electricity distribution easier, as ammonia batteries could be relatively stable and easily distributed as well.

replies(2): >>42729889 #>>42734457 #
1. magic_smoke_ee ◴[] No.42734457[source]
1/3 the energy density of diesel and way more dangerous to lives and property.
replies(1): >>42741681 #
2. smaudet ◴[] No.42741681[source]
Some quick research suggest, though, that the production of biodiesel is far more intensive (algae/oil farms are needed, then a process of procurement, production), and not without its own environmental concerns.