←back to thread

258 points signa11 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 3.482s | source
Show context
AtlasBarfed ◴[] No.42733143[source]
Linux will politically continue to fail to extract needed monetary support from first world countries and mega corps principally dependant on it.

In particular, my libraries and national security concerns.

The US government has its underwear in a bunch over various Chinese sources hardware, but continues to let a bunch of hobbyists maintain the software.

I almost think it is time to hold these massive orgs accountable by merging targeted vulnerabilities and performance bombs unless they start paying up. Microsoft and other monopolized software companies have no issue using whatever tactics are necessary to shale the revenue from software dependent/ addicted orgs.

replies(4): >>42733564 #>>42733872 #>>42733985 #>>42734239 #
not2b ◴[] No.42733564[source]
Most Linux kernel contributors are professionals who are paid for their work. They aren't hobbyists.

However, there are quite a few critically important tools and libraries that are essentially maintained by a volunteer as a hobby, and yes, that's a risk.

replies(2): >>42733811 #>>42737960 #
1. SoftTalker ◴[] No.42733811[source]
Hence the observation that "single-maintainer projects (or subsystems, or packages) will be seen as risky".