←back to thread

Comment on 2015 mRNA paper suggests data re-used in different contexts

(pubpeer.com)
159 points picture | 1 comments | 16 Jan 25 17:24 UTC | HN request time: 0.21s | source
Show context
philipwhiuk ◴[16 Jan 25 18:03 UTC] No.42728621[source]▶
Can someone change the title to:

"Comment on Nature paper on 2015 mRNA paper suggests data re-used in different contexts"

The current title would suggest music to most lay-people.

replies(7): >>42728700 #>>42728730 #>>42729437 #>>42729538 #>>42729558 #>>42729793 #>>42732740 #
dang ◴[16 Jan 25 19:31 UTC] No.42729793[source]▶
Ok, we've changed it. Submitted title was "Same three bands appear in three different presentations with different labels".

picture (the submitter) had the right idea—it's often better to take a subtitle or a representative sentence from the article when an original title isn't suitable for whatever reason, but since in this case it's ambiguous, we can change it.

If there's a better phrase from the article itself, we can change it again.

replies(2): >>42730644 #>>42731284 #
1. Kye ◴[16 Jan 25 20:43 UTC] No.42730644[source]▶
>> "Same three bands appear in three different presentations with different labels"

This has the makings of a Highlander episode. Three groups of immortals forming bands in different generations.