←back to thread

744 points DearNarwhal | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.21s | source
Show context
netghost ◴[] No.42729058[source]
The one thing that kills me is the number of "modern" blogs/sites that don't offer rss or atom is really frustrating. If I really like your site, please let me be an engaged reader and let me know when you have something valuable to say again!

I've even resorted to adding features in my personal feedreader to seek out common feed locations or APIs that common blogging tools leave on mostly unnoticed.

replies(3): >>42729528 #>>42730067 #>>42732068 #
Dalewyn ◴[] No.42730067[source]
Back like 15 to 20 years ago when I ran or helped manage some hobbyist websites, I added RSS functionality if only because it was "popular" back then.

I can confidently tell you not a single bloody soul used it, at the height of adoption no less.

If I run a website again I definitely won't bother, it's additional maintenance for a feature nobody uses. The cost-to-benefit ratio makes no sense because the benefit is zero.

replies(2): >>42730560 #>>42735640 #
1. numinix ◴[] No.42730560[source]
In an effort to bypass Google News and broaden my media bubble - I tried to find RSS feeds from our national newspapers. Most had RSS at some point, but almost none still had it running.