←back to thread

744 points DearNarwhal | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
bluGill ◴[] No.42729542[source]
A good algorithm is a good thing. However what a good algorithm is for me is often different from what it is for those who maintain them. Outrage gets attention and sometimes it is needed, but there is a level of too much, and also a lot of outrage unfairly represents the issues and so it makes me mad even though if I understood the details I wouldn't be mad just concerned.

I want an algorithm that surfaces things of interest to me, then says "you have seen it all, go outside" (with an option of if I'm confined to a hospital bed to go on). Algorithm maintainers want me to keep scrolling for more ad dollars.

replies(11): >>42729694 #>>42730030 #>>42730343 #>>42731465 #>>42732223 #>>42732697 #>>42733474 #>>42733961 #>>42735114 #>>42764093 #>>42764671 #
1. nialv7 ◴[] No.42730030[source]
You said what I wanted to say.

I think there is a niche market for tools that allow individuals to train their own recommendation systems.