←back to thread

744 points DearNarwhal | 2 comments | | HN request time: 4.291s | source
Show context
s1mplicissimus ◴[] No.42727908[source]
If I remember correctly "the algorithm" as a concept of feed curation has been introduced by facebook ( or youtube?), long after RSS was used by blogs and podcasts. Heck, even Twitter used to have an RSS feed they killed a looong time ago [1]

I also remember that in the beginning I was chuckling to myself "who on earth would want to have their feed curated by a black box whose target function cannot be checked? If I wanted that, I could just keep reading a single newspaper." - turns out I was very wrong and lots of people seem to prefer just getting washed in a steady stream of somewhat internally consistent worldview.

Would be really nice to see RSS make a comeback

[1] https://sociable.co/social-media/twitter-rss-feed-creator/

replies(5): >>42727969 #>>42728154 #>>42728952 #>>42729089 #>>42729593 #
zahlman ◴[] No.42727969[source]
>turns out I was very wrong and lots of people seem to prefer just getting washed in a steady stream of somewhat internally consistent worldview.

If you're putting together an RSS feed from creators you like, isn't that liable to happen anyway?

replies(2): >>42727989 #>>42729546 #
dartos ◴[] No.42727989[source]
I think the “washed in a steady stream” part is missing from RSS feeds.

You’d need to join like meta rss feeds.

replies(1): >>42728852 #
criddell ◴[] No.42728852[source]
Meta et al have an infinite feed. You can scroll forever.

My news reader had 6 articles in it yesterday and that's it. I can reload as many times as I want and that won't change.

replies(1): >>42729125 #
1. reverendsteveii ◴[] No.42729125[source]
little "m" meta, as in "rss feeds about rss feeds" rather than big "M" Meta the company
replies(1): >>42730401 #
2. dartos ◴[] No.42730401[source]
Yes, I realize now that it was a little confusing.

Meta is still Facebook in my mind.