←back to thread

Comment on 2015 mRNA paper suggests data re-used in different contexts

(pubpeer.com)
159 points picture | 1 comments | 16 Jan 25 17:24 UTC | HN request time: 1.641s | source
1. sega_sai ◴[16 Jan 25 18:22 UTC] No.42728878[source]▶
At least this paper has only 43 citations over last 10 years, which is really nothing for Nature, which means it's basically irrelevant. (Obviously it is still a good idea to identify cheaters)