←back to thread

Comment on 2015 mRNA paper suggests data re-used in different contexts

(pubpeer.com)
159 points picture | 4 comments | 16 Jan 25 17:24 UTC | HN request time: 0.239s | source
1. smusamashah ◴[16 Jan 25 18:11 UTC] No.42728742[source]▶
They have a playlist of 3500 videos showing images like this one

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLlXXK20HE_dV8rBa2h-8P9d-0...

replies(2): >>42728836 #>>42730202 #
2. ◴[16 Jan 25 18:18 UTC] No.42728836[source]▶
3. k2enemy ◴[16 Jan 25 20:05 UTC] No.42730202[source]▶
I was curious how the video creators were able to generate so many videos in such a short timeframe. It looks like it might be automated with this tech: https://rivervalley.io/products/research-integrity
replies(1): >>42736706 #
4. bArray ◴[17 Jan 25 12:10 UTC] No.42736706[source]▶
Very cool. I wish these guys would have a podcast discussing high profile papers, how influential they are, what sorts of projects have been built on top of them and then be like "uh oh, it looks like our system detecting something strange about the results".

I wish wish wish there was something similar also for computer science. If I got paid for how many papers that looked interested but could not be replicated, I would be rich.