←back to thread

Comment on 2015 mRNA paper suggests data re-used in different contexts

(pubpeer.com)
159 points picture | 1 comments | 16 Jan 25 17:24 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
barbazoo ◴[16 Jan 25 17:54 UTC] No.42728505[source]▶
Would this imply that someone faked data in a paper they published?
replies(1): >>42728519 #
UltraSane ◴[16 Jan 25 17:55 UTC] No.42728519[source]▶
Hard to explain how else it could happen.
replies(2): >>42728552 #>>42728580 #
boogieknite ◴[16 Jan 25 17:57 UTC] No.42728552[source]▶
any reason hanlons razor doesnt apply here? honest question, im just a regular 4 year degree off to work guy
replies(4): >>42728598 #>>42728665 #>>42728900 #>>42729004 #
1. the__alchemist ◴[16 Jan 25 18:01 UTC] No.42728598[source]▶
There are perverse incentives in scientific publishing, and there are not many alternative explanations.