←back to thread

Comment on 2015 mRNA paper suggests data re-used in different contexts

(pubpeer.com)
159 points picture | 2 comments | 16 Jan 25 17:24 UTC | HN request time: 0.422s | source
Show context
barbazoo ◴[16 Jan 25 17:54 UTC] No.42728505[source]▶
Would this imply that someone faked data in a paper they published?
replies(1): >>42728519 #
UltraSane ◴[16 Jan 25 17:55 UTC] No.42728519[source]▶
Hard to explain how else it could happen.
replies(2): >>42728552 #>>42728580 #
1. emeraldd ◴[16 Jan 25 18:00 UTC] No.42728580[source]▶
Could this be a repeat of the Xerox image duplication bug? https://www.dkriesel.com/en/blog/2013/0802_xerox-workcentres...
replies(1): >>42728667 #
2. jldugger ◴[16 Jan 25 18:06 UTC] No.42728667[source]▶
In different documents?