←back to thread

744 points DearNarwhal | 9 comments | | HN request time: 0.979s | source | bottom
1. j2kun ◴[] No.42728400[source]
One thing I wish I could easily augment with RSS is the ability to send and discover webmentions. I would love to read something in my RSS feed, respond to it, and post a webmention back to the original author. I'd also like to be able to see in the RSS feed what other pages have posted webmentions to the page I'm reading.
replies(3): >>42728427 #>>42729110 #>>42730144 #
2. pluc ◴[] No.42728427[source]
You are describing Postbacks: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postback
replies(1): >>42729248 #
3. mawise ◴[] No.42729110[source]
I have opinions[1] on Webmentions. It sounds like such a great approach, but it also opens up the original author to hosting mountains of spam and other low-quality comments, and moderation is a lot of work. Arguably, we see the same problem today on sites that let you post comments.

[1] https://havenweb.org/2023/04/10/private-comments.html

replies(1): >>42730139 #
4. yakshaving_jgt ◴[] No.42729248[source]
I don't think this Wikipedia page is describing the thing you think it is. Maybe it's the wrong link?
replies(1): >>42732352 #
5. j2kun ◴[] No.42730139[source]
True, but mostly what I want is to see what other _articles_ are written in response, less about comments.
6. mxuribe ◴[] No.42730144[source]
What you're referring to @j2kun is named a *social reader*. See: https://indieweb.org/social_reader I'm sure there other examples of software/clients besides those portrayed on indieweb.org too.
7. sltkr ◴[] No.42732352{3}[source]
He's probably thinking about: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pingback
replies(2): >>42734535 #>>42739763 #
8. yakshaving_jgt ◴[] No.42734535{4}[source]
I think you're right.

It's a shame that this was so vulnerable to abuse. Webmentions as a concept is such a great idea. Maybe the more recent implementation is better, but it doesn't seem like many people (relatively speaking) are familiar with the idea.

9. pluc ◴[] No.42739763{4}[source]
Correct! Thanks for correcting