←back to thread

781 points HelloUsername | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
wat10000 ◴[] No.42725342[source]
It seems like the days of revolutionary consumer electronics are over.

This looks nice, for sure. But it’s really more of the same. Not surprising. It does surprise me that there’s such emphasis on it, though. There’s the name, of course, and then the entire video is based around “it’s the same thing but a little better.”

Game console updates used to be big deals. The SNES was a revolution. PS2 was huge. Now… PS5? What’s different from PS4, again? Is there a 6? What’s different about that?

I don’t blame Nintendo or the others. I have no idea what they could do here they would be revolutionary. I think the design space has just been thoroughly explored by now and that’s where we are.

This pattern repeats all over the place. TVs are maxed out, with better visual quality than people care about, and size limited by wall space. Computers get a little faster every year. This year’s phones are last year’s phones with a minor performance bump and slightly better cameras. And again, I don’t see what they can do better, and that’s probably how it has to be at this point.

But it’s still a little shocking to see a company lean so far into the theme of “we made incremental improvements to this thing we released 8 years ago.”

replies(7): >>42725373 #>>42725378 #>>42725551 #>>42725908 #>>42726869 #>>42727568 #>>42728828 #
isk517 ◴[] No.42727568[source]
>The SNES was a revolution

Nintendo has actually stated they view the SNES as a evolution of the NES. They have directly stated their hardware development cycle goes Revolution>Evolution>Revolution. Considering that the Switch was considered one of their revolutionary leap (their first hybrid console) it is no surprise the Switch 2 is a simple evolution of that concept. If their next console is another iteration of the Switch THEN it is safe to say they are no longer aiming to revolutionize their hardware.

Edit: After tons of searching I am starting to think that I am misremembering thing. I think this idea came about from the Wii's 'Revolution' code name and I Mandela Effected myself into think there was a interview we're either Miyamoto or Iwata talked about this being there philosophy when designing system.

replies(3): >>42727657 #>>42727734 #>>42728673 #
hedora ◴[] No.42727734[source]
I’d be curious to know when they said that. It sounds like revisionist history to me.

Based on the switch launch video, the delta between the NES and SNES was much higher than Switch -> Switch 2.

Here’s an analogous snes ad, which spends most of its time showing off 3d and increased sprite counts:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eSBFw93V3Rg

replies(2): >>42727927 #>>42730037 #
1. isk517 ◴[] No.42727927{3}[source]
Sorry, tried to find the interview and failed. It would most like have come out around the Wii's release/development since it used the code name Revolution.