←back to thread

781 points HelloUsername | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
tmvphil ◴[] No.42726064[source]
I get this is Nintendo, so it'll never be fixed, but I honestly hate having to buy Nintendo hardware just to play the three or four big-name platform exclusives per generation. It would be so much better for consumers if they would just abandon the hardware and be a regular games company
replies(2): >>42726130 #>>42727304 #
lenerdenator ◴[] No.42726130[source]
I think the same thing. Metroid is good, but is it $250+ good? Meh.

Microsoft more-or-less does the same thing with Windows in the personal consumer market. With Office being online these days, the primary motivation for a lot of people to buy a Windows license for a computer instead of using Linux or buying a Mac is gaming, along with pure inertia.

This will be a problem with everything until games are FLOSS.

replies(2): >>42726354 #>>42726589 #
spencerflem ◴[] No.42726354[source]
Sadly, I don't think games will ever be FLOSS until we figure out how to get people to pay for FLOSS software.
replies(2): >>42726824 #>>42727155 #
lenerdenator ◴[] No.42727155[source]
You could probably get away with a purely volunteer effort on... eh, how to describe this... like Super Mario 64 for Mac/Linux/PC.

And I do mean Super Mario 64 with respect to the technology/artwork level. Which is fine by me.

But the big AAA games and the multiplayer games that all of the hip young people with their poggers Twitch streaming and their deadass rock music play? Yeah, can't build those given the state of everything these days.

replies(2): >>42727348 #>>42727898 #
1. spencerflem ◴[] No.42727348{3}[source]
Most successful games, AAA or indie, are the result of years of full time work, most of which is making the content. I just don't see that being possible in general, without being independently wealthy.

Games also benefit from a single vision in general, which is hard to square with volunteer style development.

There are certainly exceptions of games that are built as a community: nethack, space station 13, idk probably a third one. But I just can't see this being commonly done until we figure out how free software devs can eat.

With that said: I love free software and hope this problem is solvable, but unless society changes dramatically we may need to learn to do without not just AAA scope games, but even Stardew Valley scope games