←back to thread

781 points HelloUsername | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.215s | source
Show context
jjice ◴[] No.42724951[source]
I’m glad to see Nintendo found a form factor that’s kind of gimmicky that actually worked. The Wii and Wii U were too gimmicky, but portability was a great choice. I’m also glad to see backwards compatibility.

I’m excited to see what kind of hardware improvements have been made. The switch came out in March 2017, just about 8 years ago. Just due to the way Nintendo games have their animated charm, they’re able to make their games look excellent on that hardware still. That said, I’d love to see how good a Zelda game looks on some new hardware.

replies(6): >>42725134 #>>42725142 #>>42725221 #>>42725276 #>>42725408 #>>42728020 #
xnx ◴[] No.42725134[source]
The Wii was a huge success and the Wii U was a step toward the Switch, which combines the best of both of those consoles.
replies(1): >>42725369 #
bogwog ◴[] No.42725369[source]
> which combines the best of both of those consoles.

Minus the dual screen of the Wii U, which was awesome. It'd be cool if the Switch 2's dock could work independently of the console, so that you could have a reverse Wii U- experience with it. The dual screen setup can be a neat gimmick for gameplay, but it's biggest strength is the convenience that comes from having a second screen closer to your face. You can have less visual clutter on the main screen, and reduce the amount of menus players need to click through.

replies(5): >>42725730 #>>42726092 #>>42726586 #>>42726987 #>>42727594 #
1. xnx ◴[] No.42725730[source]
A feature they could still possibly have snuck in would be the ability to cast a feed from the handheld to a TV.