←back to thread

781 points HelloUsername | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.465s | source
Show context
wat10000 ◴[] No.42725342[source]
It seems like the days of revolutionary consumer electronics are over.

This looks nice, for sure. But it’s really more of the same. Not surprising. It does surprise me that there’s such emphasis on it, though. There’s the name, of course, and then the entire video is based around “it’s the same thing but a little better.”

Game console updates used to be big deals. The SNES was a revolution. PS2 was huge. Now… PS5? What’s different from PS4, again? Is there a 6? What’s different about that?

I don’t blame Nintendo or the others. I have no idea what they could do here they would be revolutionary. I think the design space has just been thoroughly explored by now and that’s where we are.

This pattern repeats all over the place. TVs are maxed out, with better visual quality than people care about, and size limited by wall space. Computers get a little faster every year. This year’s phones are last year’s phones with a minor performance bump and slightly better cameras. And again, I don’t see what they can do better, and that’s probably how it has to be at this point.

But it’s still a little shocking to see a company lean so far into the theme of “we made incremental improvements to this thing we released 8 years ago.”

replies(7): >>42725373 #>>42725378 #>>42725551 #>>42725908 #>>42726869 #>>42727568 #>>42728828 #
surgical_fire ◴[] No.42725551[source]
> PS2 was huge

PS2 was literally just an iteration on the PS1. More powerful console, DVD instead of CD, and that was it. Nothing really new there.

Hell, the Switch 2 is more innovative than the PS2 was in terms of iteration on a previous console.

replies(3): >>42725666 #>>42728935 #>>42737162 #
1. wat10000 ◴[] No.42725666[source]
“More powerful” was enough to be a step change at the time. You’d get huge improvements in image quality, realism, and immersion.

Now, compare a new game with one from ten years ago. The new one looks a little better. Not much.

replies(1): >>42726413 #
2. kypro ◴[] No.42726413[source]
The graphics bump you'd see from next gen systems prior 2010 was massive. So big in fact that it would unlock new genres of games which weren't previously possible.

ps1 > ps2 was pretty huge too because I'd argue the ps2 marked the first generation of consoles where games could move away from pixelated cartoony characters and into photo-realistic graphics and just about pull it off.

Today you get better lighting and shadows, or slightly higher FPS which is nice, but it doesn't really change the types of games you can make in the way the ps2 did.