←back to thread

781 points HelloUsername | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.003s | source
Show context
napolux ◴[] No.42724828[source]
That's what I wanted. An improved Switch. Waiting for the specs
replies(1): >>42724854 #
ksec ◴[] No.42724854[source]
Same here. Really hope it is more than what was rumoured, which was using some 6 years old tech.
replies(2): >>42724916 #>>42725050 #
1. ryoshu ◴[] No.42724916[source]
Nintendo never really uses brand new tech. It's their design philosophy. https://medium.com/@adamagb/nintendo-s-little-known-product-...
replies(3): >>42724960 #>>42725118 #>>42727507 #
2. oneeyedpigeon ◴[] No.42724960[source]
It's a philosophy that worked for them incredibly well with the Switch, so unlikely they'll totally reverse it for the Switch 2.
3. ksec ◴[] No.42725118[source]
Previous Nintendo were on 4-5 years tech. The rumoured tech is 5-6 years. A difference between two cycles or three cycles.
4. SecretDreams ◴[] No.42727507[source]
> It's their design philosophy

I would say it's more about minimizing cost of the console and their first party games just so happen to be not intensive enough to need it... But some games would have absolutely benefitted from a bit better hardware.