←back to thread

Matt Mullenweg deactivates WordPress accounts of contributors planning a fork

(techcrunch.com)
465 points impish9208 | 3 comments | 11 Jan 25 18:14 UTC | HN request time: 0.219s | source
Show context
diggan ◴[11 Jan 25 23:28 UTC] No.42669804[source]▶
From Mullenweg (https://wordpress.org/news/2025/01/jkpress/):

> To make this easy and hopefully give this project the push it needs to get off the ground, I’m deactivating the .org accounts of Joost, Karim, Se Reed, Heather Burns, and Morten Rand-Hendriksen. I strongly encourage anyone who wants to try different leadership models or align with WP Engine to join up with their new effort.

He seems to be justifying the deactivation by claiming it will 'help them', somehow?

replies(6): >>42669824 #>>42669902 #>>42670883 #>>42670894 #>>42671194 #>>42672056 #
sd9 ◴[11 Jan 25 23:42 UTC] No.42669902[source]▶
This post is wild. Mullenweg comes across as completely unstable, insecure, and appears to feel very threatened. He takes every opportunity he can to give a thinly veiled insult.

Wordpress is a giant. If he’s as confident as he tries to present in this post, he could just do nothing and Wordpress would prove the more valuable software in the end. Instead, he’s accelerating progress on the fork.

He could have done with taking a few deep breaths before publishing this post.

replies(1): >>42670194 #
bdndndndbve ◴[12 Jan 25 00:43 UTC] No.42670194[source]▶
Have you followed this at all? The man has been in HN threads arguing about posts about himself for months. He's on some kind of scorched earth ego trip.

His profile: https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=photomatt

replies(5): >>42670246 #>>42670296 #>>42670672 #>>42671710 #>>42673754 #
1. wodenokoto ◴[12 Jan 25 14:25 UTC] No.42673754[source]▶
I think down voting photomatt is immature and unconstructive. Whether you agree or disagree with his opinion, I think his views are quite central to a discussion on what is going on.

Down votes hides posts. I don't understand why so many HN'er wants Matt's comments removed from HN threads about WP.

replies(2): >>42674140 #>>42677731 #
2. eGQjxkKF6fif ◴[12 Jan 25 15:16 UTC] No.42674140[source]▶
I think you misunderstand entirely. HN wants Matt removed from the internet, and for good reason.
3. SlightlyLeftPad ◴[12 Jan 25 22:42 UTC] No.42677731[source]▶
As someone who hasn’t been following this at all. It seems like I’m watching a digital mob go after a heretic which is interesting.