←back to thread

43 points anarbadalov | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.876s | source | bottom
1. _DeadFred_ ◴[] No.42628124[source]
Things like this were previous a pain, but now with AI being able to easily shift through these things to identify high value targets (adversary's military personnel, politicians/executives for blackmailers) maybe something will finally be done. Heck I bet if someone provided a weaponized AI platform to digest this information and float everything of interest in it to the top that might finally get something done.

I think at some point the system needs to switch to aggregating violence/damage inflicted when it's against thousands/millions of people. A business can't just ruin one persons life without consequence. Slightly damaging millions of lives should rise to a similar level at some point.

replies(2): >>42628386 #>>42628748 #
2. nullc ◴[] No.42628386[source]
Someone going after "high value" targets can just buy the data commercially.
replies(2): >>42628472 #>>42628845 #
3. qwertox ◴[] No.42628472[source]
There was a related talk at the 38c3:

Databroker Files: How Apps and Data Brokers Enable Mass Surveillance

https://youtube.com/watch?v=3GmYJo2LqtA

4. TheJoeMan ◴[] No.42628748[source]
If I recall, a senator's salacious 1G text messages getting captured spurred quite a bit of security development.
5. _DeadFred_ ◴[] No.42628845[source]
Sure, but I can't. But I can weaponize leaked/hacked data sets to bring attention and get the government to care since they don't currently seem to care about the data being collected nor it being laxly protected.
replies(1): >>42644066 #
6. 486sx33 ◴[] No.42644066{3}[source]
But if you had money you could. Register a new business, pay the broker, good to go.