←back to thread

569 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.234s | source
Show context
albert_e ◴[] No.42600082[source]
They did not mention --

Text littered with hyperlinks on every sentence. Hyperlinks that do on-hover gimmicks like load previews or charts. Emojis or other distracting graphics (like stock ticker symbols and price indicators GOOG +7%) littered among the text.

Backgrounds and images that change with scrolling.

Popups asking to allow the website to send you notifications.

Page footers that are two pages high with 200 links.

Fine print and copyright legalese.

Cookie policy banners that have multiple confusing options and list of 1000 affiliate third parties.

Traditional banner and text ads.

Many other dark patterns.

replies(5): >>42600185 #>>42600252 #>>42601723 #>>42602072 #>>42617954 #
dredmorbius ◴[] No.42600252[source]
Another: "Related" interstitial elements scattered within an article.

Fucking NPR now has ~2--6 "Related" links between paragraphs of a story. I frequently read the site via w3m, and yes, will load the rendered buffer in vim (<esc>-e) to delete those when reading an article.

I don't know if it's oversensitisation or progressive cognitive decline, but even quite modest distracting cruft is increasingly intolerable.

If you truly have related stories, pile them at the end of the article, and put in some goddamned microcontent (title, description, publication date) for the article.

As I've mentioned previously, my "cnn-sanify" script which strips story links and headlines from CNN's own "lite" page, and restructures those into section-organised, time-sorted presentation. Mostly for reading from the shell, though I can dump the rendered file locally and read it in a GUI browser as well.

See: <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42535359>

My biggest disappointment: CNN's article selection is pretty poor. I'd recently checked against 719 stories collected since ~18 December 2024, and of the 111 "US" stories, 54% are relatively mundane crime. Substantive stories are the exception.

(The sense that few of the headlines really were significant was a large part of why I'd written the organisation script in the first place.)

replies(5): >>42603269 #>>42607015 #>>42607543 #>>42609437 #>>42611254 #
pabs3 ◴[] No.42607543[source]
Use their text mode site:

https://text.npr.org/

replies(1): >>42608011 #
dredmorbius ◴[] No.42608011[source]
That's actually what I'm referring to.

Go ahead and load that up, then start reading articles.

From the current headline set, there's "FBI says suspect in New Orleans attack twice visited the city to conduct surveillance"

<https://text.npr.org/nx-s1-5249046>

That has three occurrences of:

  Related Story: NPR
Which is specifically what I was criticising.
replies(1): >>42623089 #
1. dekhn ◴[] No.42623089[source]
Those are placed on the side in the full version of the site (presumably using some styling that can't be rendered in text). The side article title is there, along with a photo.

(I gave up on any sort of "text mode" of a site a long time ago)