←back to thread

Nvidia's Project Digits is a 'personal AI supercomputer'

(techcrunch.com)
623 points magicalhippo | 4 comments | 07 Jan 25 04:14 UTC | HN request time: 2.643s | source
Show context
gavi ◴[07 Jan 25 14:11 UTC] No.42622469[source]▶
this image seems to be AI Generated - :-)

https://s3.amazonaws.com/cms.ipressroom.com/219/files/20250/...

Source: https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-puts-grace-blackwe...

replies(3): >>42622515 #>>42622563 #>>42623165 #
paxys ◴[07 Jan 25 14:21 UTC] No.42622563[source]▶
The text on the screen is an obvious giveaway.
replies(1): >>42622607 #
1. diggan ◴[07 Jan 25 14:25 UTC] No.42622607[source]▶
Damn, you're right. I didn't even consider looking at the monitor itself as "They can't be so lazy they don't even use a real screenshot" while faking the rest kind of makes sense, otherwise you need a studio setup.

Never underestimate how lazy companies with a ~$3 trillion market cap can be.

replies(2): >>42623126 #>>42623352 #
2. sipjca ◴[07 Jan 25 15:07 UTC] No.42623126[source]▶
I mean the whole company is betting on AI, why wouldn’t they use AI to generate the image?? Fundamentally it doesn’t matter if it was AI generated or not, most people don’t care and the people that do won’t impact their bottom line
3. adolph ◴[07 Jan 25 15:27 UTC] No.42623352[source]▶
Lazy? This is Nvidia eating their own dogfood. They put in lots of work to get to the point where someone can call it "lazy."
replies(1): >>42625717 #
4. diggan ◴[07 Jan 25 18:36 UTC] No.42625717[source]▶
> Lazy? This is Nvidia eating their own dogfood

Absolutely, I'm all for dogfooding! But when you do, make sure you get and use good results, not something that looks like it was generated by someone who just learned about Stable Diffusion :)