←back to thread

569 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
albert_e ◴[] No.42600082[source]
They did not mention --

Text littered with hyperlinks on every sentence. Hyperlinks that do on-hover gimmicks like load previews or charts. Emojis or other distracting graphics (like stock ticker symbols and price indicators GOOG +7%) littered among the text.

Backgrounds and images that change with scrolling.

Popups asking to allow the website to send you notifications.

Page footers that are two pages high with 200 links.

Fine print and copyright legalese.

Cookie policy banners that have multiple confusing options and list of 1000 affiliate third parties.

Traditional banner and text ads.

Many other dark patterns.

replies(5): >>42600185 #>>42600252 #>>42601723 #>>42602072 #>>42617954 #
ericrallen ◴[] No.42602072[source]
I really appreciate hyperlinks that serve as citations, like “here’s some prior art to back up what I’m saying,” or that explain some joke, reference, jargon, etc. that the reader might not be familiar with, but unfortunately a lot of sites don’t use them that way.
replies(1): >>42611444 #
1. specialist ◴[] No.42611444[source]
IIRC, suck.com did this really well.