←back to thread

569 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
swyx ◴[] No.42599320[source]
this is exactly the sort of idealistic post that appeals to HN and nobody else. i dont have a problem with that apart from when technologists try to take these "back to basics" stuff to shame the substacks and the company blogs out there that have to be more powered by economics than by personal passion.

its -obvious- things are mostly "better"/can be less "annoying" when money/resources are not a concern. i too would like to spend all my time in a world with no scarcity.

the engineering challenge is finding alignments where "better for reader" overlaps with "better for writer" - as google did with doubleclick back in the day.

replies(8): >>42599404 #>>42599406 #>>42599783 #>>42599973 #>>42600198 #>>42608321 #>>42610248 #>>42610867 #
1. SPBS ◴[] No.42608321[source]
> appeals to HN and nobody else

Your argument is that writers do this because of "economics", but to the detriment of readers. I don't see how this extends only to HN readers. It applies to all readers in general.