←back to thread

569 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
swyx ◴[] No.42599320[source]
this is exactly the sort of idealistic post that appeals to HN and nobody else. i dont have a problem with that apart from when technologists try to take these "back to basics" stuff to shame the substacks and the company blogs out there that have to be more powered by economics than by personal passion.

its -obvious- things are mostly "better"/can be less "annoying" when money/resources are not a concern. i too would like to spend all my time in a world with no scarcity.

the engineering challenge is finding alignments where "better for reader" overlaps with "better for writer" - as google did with doubleclick back in the day.

replies(8): >>42599404 #>>42599406 #>>42599783 #>>42599973 #>>42600198 #>>42608321 #>>42610248 #>>42610867 #
MathMonkeyMan ◴[] No.42599406[source]
The author isn't trying to profit from the reader's attention; it's just a personal blog. An ad-based business would. Neither is right or wrong, but the latter is distinctly annoying.
replies(1): >>42599639 #
NotYourLawyer ◴[] No.42599639[source]
Ad-based businesses are indeed wrong and immoral.
replies(1): >>42600206 #
StressedDev ◴[] No.42600206[source]
Ad-based businesses exist because a lot of people (including many on this forum) refuse to pay for anything. During the late 1990s/early 2000s, people hated paying for anything and demanded that everything on the Internet should be free. Well, that led to the vast surveillance machine which powers Google, Facebook, and every ad-tech business out there. They need surveillance because it lets them serve more relevant ads and more relevant ads make more money.

The bottom line is if you hate ad-based businesses, start paying for things.

replies(7): >>42600222 #>>42600288 #>>42601253 #>>42605449 #>>42605712 #>>42605832 #>>42611564 #
NotYourLawyer ◴[] No.42600222{4}[source]
Yes, it’s the individuals’ fault. Google, FB, and the rest need to spy on us! I feel just awful for those poor companies.

No. If your business model requires you to do evil things, your business should not exist.

Anyway, I do pay for services that provide value. I was a paying Kagi customer until recently, for example (not thrilled with the direction things are going there now though).

replies(1): >>42600338 #
Dweller1622 ◴[] No.42600338{5}[source]
What is the direction that things are going at Kagi now? What were they before?
replies(1): >>42600512 #
NotYourLawyer ◴[] No.42600512{6}[source]
All the AI shit, plus this

https://old.reddit.com/r/ukraine/comments/1gvcqua/psa_the_ka...

replies(1): >>42604798 #
1. Dweller1622 ◴[] No.42604798{7}[source]
Product development disagreements are largely immaterial to me, though the discussion around their integrations with Yandex remind me of prior discussions around their integrations with Brave.

Either way, thanks for sharing.