←back to thread

230 points craigkerstiens | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.211s | source
1. pphysch ◴[] No.42576697[source]
The naming of "rand_a" and "rand_b" in the spec is a bit misleading. They don't have to be generated randomly. I'm sure there's a historical reason for it.

"extra_" or "distinct_" would be a more accurate prefix for UUIDv7.

UUIDv7 is actually quite a flexible standard due to these two underspecified fields. I'm glad Postgres took advantage of that!