←back to thread

223 points benkaiser | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
1. nickpsecurity ◴[] No.42537417[source]
I tested this back when GPT4 was new. I found ChatGPT could quote the verses well. If I asked it to summarize something, it would sometimes hallucinate stuff that had nothing to do with what was in the text. If I prompted it carefully, it could do a proper exegesis of many passages using the historical-grammatical method.

I believe this happens because the verses and verse-specific commentary are abundant in the pre-training sources they used. Whereas, if one asks a highly-interpretive question, then it starts re-hashing other patterns in its training data which are un-Biblical. Asking about intelligent design, it got super hostile trying to beat me into submission to its materialistic worldview every paragraph.

So, they have their uses. I’ve often pushed for a large model trained on Project Gutenberg to have a 100% legal model for research and personal use. A side benefit of such a scheme would be that Gutenberg has both Bibles and good commentaries which trainers could repeat for memorization. One could add licensed, Christian works on a variety of topics to a derived model to make a Christian assistant AI.

replies(1): >>42544731 #
2. hobobaggins ◴[] No.42544731[source]
Do you have an X or other social acct to get in touch?
replies(1): >>42545218 #
3. nickpsecurity ◴[] No.42545218[source]
Email me: digitalkevlar@gmail.com
replies(1): >>42563511 #
4. hobobaggins ◴[] No.42563511{3}[source]
Thanks I will!
replies(1): >>42569829 #
5. nickpsecurity ◴[] No.42569829{4}[source]
One of you who just emailed me can't receive my reply due to a configuration error. I think it was you. Gmail says:

"response from the remote server was '554 5.7.1: relay access denied."

If it was you, just email me back when you think that's fixed and I'll re-send hte reply. :)