←back to thread

556 points greenie_beans | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
crazygringo ◴[] No.42472475[source]
I see absolutely no problem with this. Look, I love music, listening to an album through, learning about artists, etc.

But sometimes, I want to put something on in the background that doesn't call attention to itself, but just sets a mood. I don't want Brian Eno or Miles Davis because then I'd be paying attention -- I just want "filler".

And I have absolutely no problem with Spotify partnering with companies to produce that music, at a lower cost to Spotify, and seeding that in their own playlists. If the musicians are getting paid by the hour rather than by the stream, that's still a good gig when you consider that they don't have to do 99% of the rest of the work usually involved in producing and marketing an album only to have nobody listen to it.

The article argues that this is "stealing" from "normal" artists, but that's absurd. Artists don't have some kind of right to be featured on Spotify's playlists. This is more like a supermarket featuring their store-brand corn flakes next to Kellogg's Corn Flakes. The supermarket isn't stealing from Kellogg's. Consumers can still choose what they want to listen to. And if they want to listen to some background ambient music that is lower cost for Spotify, that's just the market working.

replies(7): >>42472631 #>>42472729 #>>42472972 #>>42473173 #>>42473242 #>>42473292 #>>42473320 #
dclowd9901 ◴[] No.42472631[source]
Is there nothing troubling about the fact that the company who _decides_ what you're listening to decides that you only listen to their music? I didn't sign up for that. I use Spotify to find new artists so I can follow their artistic journey and see them in concert. Perhaps some folks see music as shallow background filler but for people like me who value its contributions to my mental health and a big part of my social interactions, this kind of thing just scoops the soul out of it all. I'll be canceling my subscription.
replies(6): >>42472725 #>>42472831 #>>42472837 #>>42472929 #>>42472957 #>>42472965 #
aeturnum ◴[] No.42472837[source]
You aren't required to only listen to their music. You are free to make your own playlists with the artists you like. But Spotify publishes playlists with artists they would prefer you listen to, which is kinda annoying, but is hardly them "deciding you only listen to their music."

Like, I get why this feels scummy, but I use Spotify often and have literally never used one of these playlists. They haven't forced me to listen to anything.

replies(1): >>42482488 #
1. dclowd9901 ◴[] No.42482488[source]
I get that but I use (and by extension trust) Spotify to introduce me to new _real_ artists. I can't do that on my own or I wouldn't use Spotify at all.