←back to thread

168 points fueloil | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.399s | source
Show context
daft_pink ◴[] No.42481334[source]
I don’t quite understand why they don’t just let trusted users manually rate search results and feed that through AI to determine ranking penalties similar but not exactly like Kagi.
replies(4): >>42481356 #>>42481500 #>>42481655 #>>42481705 #
1. summerlight ◴[] No.42481705[source]
https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/9281931?hl=en

They're already doing that with paid quality raters. I suppose your question is about opening this up more widely, but that's basically giving those spammers a tool to directly influence the ranking, which is going to be even worse.

replies(1): >>42484505 #
2. daft_pink ◴[] No.42484505[source]
I guess I don’t believe the paid quality raters are actually doing a good job.