←back to thread

128 points Brajeshwar | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.211s | source
Show context
underseacables ◴[] No.42479808[source]
I suppose it comes down to what the purpose of such archiving is.

I think it's the preservation of information, but I also believe 90% is absolutely pointless. There is just so much of it, and data storage so cheap, that it makes sense to just save everything.

replies(3): >>42479956 #>>42479985 #>>42480107 #
dreamcompiler ◴[] No.42479985[source]
That data storage is also ephemeral. Nobe of it will last as long as a paper note, unless some human goes to the trouble of copying it all onto new drives with new software every ten years or so.
replies(1): >>42480154 #
Atreiden ◴[] No.42480154[source]
With a proper NAS and RAID10 for double parity, it's a bit like Theseus ship. Just keep swapping out drives when they become unhealthy and you never have to rebuild or migrate
replies(2): >>42480339 #>>42480412 #
ninalanyon ◴[] No.42480339[source]
Eventually the controller will die and eventually compatible ones will no longer be produced or will at least be inconvenient to obtain or commission and hence expensive.

Paper lasts for centuries without any attention beyond keeping it moderately dry and away from things that eat it.

replies(2): >>42480390 #>>42480417 #
1. ◴[] No.42480417[source]