←back to thread

128 points Brajeshwar | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
underseacables ◴[] No.42479808[source]
I suppose it comes down to what the purpose of such archiving is.

I think it's the preservation of information, but I also believe 90% is absolutely pointless. There is just so much of it, and data storage so cheap, that it makes sense to just save everything.

replies(3): >>42479956 #>>42479985 #>>42480107 #
dreamcompiler ◴[] No.42479985[source]
That data storage is also ephemeral. Nobe of it will last as long as a paper note, unless some human goes to the trouble of copying it all onto new drives with new software every ten years or so.
replies(1): >>42480154 #
Atreiden ◴[] No.42480154[source]
With a proper NAS and RAID10 for double parity, it's a bit like Theseus ship. Just keep swapping out drives when they become unhealthy and you never have to rebuild or migrate
replies(2): >>42480339 #>>42480412 #
1. ◴[] No.42480412{3}[source]