←back to thread

372 points pseudolus | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.284s | source
1. chiefalchemist ◴[] No.42478910[source]
> surveys a nationally representative group of teens each year

Self reported with nothing actual to verify (e.g., hair sample, school sewer water sample, etc.) Self-reported data is notorious for being unreliable. Why would this be any different?

Editorial: What a waste of time and money. Hopefully taxpayers aren't paying for this.