←back to thread

349 points pseudolus | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
1. pvaldes ◴[] No.42478416[source]
Hum, If we hypothesize that drugs abuse could be ruled in part by genetics (some people are more prone to became addict than other), then the drug epidemics from 70's, 80's and 90's should had pruned a lot of this genes from the population.

The current teen not doing drugs are mostly the sons of the former teen not being killed by drugs on its 20's (because they didn't do drugs, or were able to quit drugs before it was too late).

I wonder if an effect of the Fentanyl epidemic could be traced in the genetic makeup of the future USA population, when the children of all the young that died (obviously) never appear in the population pyramid.

replies(1): >>42478773 #
2. bgnn ◴[] No.42478773[source]
wow, you have no idea how genetics work.
replies(1): >>42478950 #
3. pvaldes ◴[] No.42478950[source]
Enlighten me, please
replies(1): >>42479554 #
4. paulryanrogers ◴[] No.42479554{3}[source]
Drugs don't usually kill or cause people to die or otherwise become unwilling or unable to reproduce? In fact they may remove inhibitions and lead to producing more children than those who abstain, at least on the whole.

Anyway, I'm not sure and of that is true. It's just one set of possibilities.