←back to thread

278 points love2read | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
1. Alifatisk ◴[] No.42476456[source]
c2rust.com, but it uses things like libc::c_int
replies(1): >>42476478 #
2. love2read ◴[] No.42476478[source]
C2Rust is mentioned in the second paragraph of the related work section.
replies(1): >>42478012 #
3. rat87 ◴[] No.42478012[source]
How is c2rust doing these days? For practical codebases?