←back to thread

The era of open voice assistants

(www.home-assistant.io)
879 points _Microft | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Jarwain ◴[] No.42468180[source]
I'm actually really excited for this!

I noticed recently there weren't any good open source hardware projects for voice assistants with a focus on privacy. There's another project I've been thinking about where I think the privacy aspect is Important, and figuring out a good hardware stack has been a Process. The project I want to work on isn't exactly a voice assistant, but same ultimate hardware requirements

Something I'm kinda curious about: it sounds like they're planning on a sorta batch manufacturing by resellers type of model. Which I guess is pretty standard for hardware sales. But why not do a sorta "group buy" approach? I guess there's nothing stopping it from happening in conjunction

I've had an idea floating around for a site that enables group buys for open source hardware (or 3d printed items), that also acts like or integrates with github wrt forking/remixing

replies(5): >>42468413 #>>42468436 #>>42468945 #>>42469600 #>>42470457 #
pimeys ◴[] No.42470457[source]
I'm also very excited. I've had some ESP32 microphones before, but they were not really able to understand the wake word, sometimes even when it was quiet and you were sitting next to the mic.

This one looks like it can recognize your voice very well, even when music is playing.

Because... when it works, it's amazing. You get that Star Trek wake word (KHUM-PUTER!), you can connect your favorite LLM to it (ChatGPT, Claude Sonnet, Ollama), you can control your home automation with it and it's as private as you want.

I ordered two of these, if they are great, I will order two more. I've been waiting for this product for years, it's hopefully finally here.

replies(2): >>42472346 #>>42478129 #
nine_k ◴[] No.42472346[source]
As a side note, it always slightly puzzles me when I see "voice interface" and "private" used together. Maybe it takes living alone to issue voice commands and feel some privacy.

(Yes, I do understand that "privacy" here is mostly about not sending it for processing to third parties.)

replies(4): >>42472512 #>>42473295 #>>42474143 #>>42481940 #
staunton ◴[] No.42472512[source]
> Yes, I do understand that "privacy" here is mostly about not sending it for processing to third parties.

Then why does it puzzle you?

replies(1): >>42472822 #
entropicdrifter ◴[] No.42472822[source]
Because you wouldn't ask it deeply private questions in front of your mom, for instance
replies(3): >>42473020 #>>42475400 #>>42477749 #
1. xandrius ◴[] No.42475400{3}[source]
There are levels of privacy. Because I'm not going to ask deeply private questions, it doesn't mean that I want everyone to be snooping into what I'm planning to eat tonight.