Most active commenters

    ←back to thread

    Decline in teen drug use continues, surprising experts

    (arstechnica.com)
    349 points pseudolus | 11 comments | 17 Dec 24 23:44 UTC | HN request time: 0.806s | source | bottom
    Show context
    vouaobrasil ◴[20 Dec 24 19:19 UTC] No.42474017[source]▶
    I wonder if the new drug of choice is actually technology. In some ways I think that the addiction to technology has some similar mellowing effects as drugs. Some research indicates that smartphone addiction is also related to low self-esteem and avoidant attachment [1] and that smartphones can become an object of attachment [2]. The replacement of drugs by technology is not surprising as it significantly strengthens technological development especially as it is already well past the point of diminishing returns for improving every day life.

    1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S07475...

    2. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S07475...

    replies(27): >>42474251 #>>42474255 #>>42474258 #>>42474428 #>>42474552 #>>42474820 #>>42474840 #>>42475416 #>>42476573 #>>42476771 #>>42476830 #>>42477157 #>>42477286 #>>42477871 #>>42478303 #>>42478352 #>>42478504 #>>42478717 #>>42478824 #>>42478837 #>>42479083 #>>42479553 #>>42480244 #>>42481141 #>>42481485 #>>42482200 #>>42483991 #
    imoverclocked ◴[20 Dec 24 19:43 UTC] No.42474258[source]▶
    Be careful of a possible false dichotomy; People don’t need to have a drug.
    replies(7): >>42474352 #>>42474404 #>>42474416 #>>42474936 #>>42474953 #>>42476667 #>>42477249 #
    1. dpndencekultur ◴[20 Dec 24 20:59 UTC] No.42474953[source]▶
    Indoctrination into a dependency mindset fits the "buy a solution" model that our societies run on. We are already primed for this indoctrination from the moment mother puts a pacifier in our mouths. Then constantly looking up at her approval, that constitutes the beginning of our need of approval from the women in our lives. We are programmed and primed from day 0.
    replies(3): >>42475403 #>>42479295 #>>42480753 #
    2. nozzlegear ◴[20 Dec 24 21:49 UTC] No.42475403[source]▶
    We're just missing a cigar and a dream about trains here.
    replies(1): >>42477627 #
    3. sandy_coyote ◴[21 Dec 24 04:53 UTC] No.42477627[source]▶
    What's the reference here? I thought Pink Floyd at first.
    replies(2): >>42477813 #>>42478919 #
    4. ◴[21 Dec 24 05:58 UTC] No.42477813{3}[source]▶
    5. FooBarBizBazz ◴[21 Dec 24 11:00 UTC] No.42478919{3}[source]▶
    Quoth the AI:

    > According to Freud, dreaming about trains often symbolizes the journey of life, with the train representing the progression of time and the destination representing death, and the act of riding a train can be linked to unconscious sexual desires due to the sensation of movement and confinement, particularly when experiencing anxiety about missing a train or being trapped on one.

    replies(1): >>42480668 #
    6. 9dev ◴[21 Dec 24 12:30 UTC] No.42479295[source]▶
    That kind of misogyny sounds like some deeply rooted trauma you have there, buddy.

    Have you ever considered that humans are simply social creatures, that the only thing really separating us from other animals is our ability to socialize and organise in groups?

    There is no programming, it’s our nature.

    replies(1): >>42479880 #
    7. gehwartzen ◴[21 Dec 24 14:27 UTC] No.42479880[source]▶
    So if babies are ignored and raised in isolation they still grow up with normal social skills? I think it’s fairly clear that socialization is learned (a term which I think is equivalent to programmed in this context) and not something as innate (or “in our nature”) as breathing.
    replies(1): >>42480148 #
    8. 9dev ◴[21 Dec 24 15:21 UTC] No.42480148{3}[source]▶
    That’s a fallacy. Human babies don’t grow up in isolation; if they do, it’s in contrived experiments, and drawing conclusions from that is about as helpful as watching birds in a cage.

    Humans in their natural environment will interact with other humans socially, mirror their display of emotion, and have a desire for affection.

    replies(1): >>42480373 #
    9. gehwartzen ◴[21 Dec 24 15:58 UTC] No.42480373{4}[source]▶
    Of course they will. But that’s is programming. Nurturing, socializing, teaching… all of it is programming. I’m not placing any negative connotations on the word. I’m not sure why you don’t view those things as programming?
    10. mindslight ◴[21 Dec 24 16:50 UTC] No.42480668{4}[source]▶
    Any exceptions for when you had train wallpaper as a kid? Asking for a friend.
    11. mindslight ◴[21 Dec 24 17:01 UTC] No.42480753[source]▶
    A human baby is helpless and "primed" for dependency on others - there is simply no other way they could be (without a drastically different evolutionary path). This whole thread is about the modern difficulties of teaching children to become independent in spite of that beginning and the corporate machine that wishes to keep us there ("commoditize your complements"). So uh, welcome to the conversation and try not to be so fatalistic.