←back to thread

152 points rbanffy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.275s | source
Show context
FabHK ◴[] No.42472523[source]
Do we have anomalies accumulating here that indicate the early phase of a scientific revolution in Thomas Kuhn's terminology, that is, a replacement of the standard model/QCD? Or is it still "so far, so good"?
replies(3): >>42472672 #>>42473315 #>>42473325 #
1. ◴[] No.42473315[source]