←back to thread

556 points greenie_beans | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
GuB-42 ◴[] No.42470485[source]
I am the only one to be a bit upset by the term "fake artist"?

While AI is evoked, this is not what is talked about here. The article mentions Epidemic Sound, and looking at their page, it "doesn’t currently use generative AI to create music".

It means that we are talking about real people here, there is nothing fake about them and their work, what they do takes skill and effort. That they focus on quantity over quality and are under-recognized does not make them "fake". Otherwise, I bet most of us would be called "fake engineers".

replies(3): >>42470829 #>>42471068 #>>42473382 #
basisword ◴[] No.42471068[source]
One of the producers in the article describes making the music as “brain-numbing” and “pretty much completely joyless.” The process is described as “...I just write out charts while lying on my back on the couch,” he explained. “And then once we have a critical mass, they organize a session and we play them. And it’s usually just like, one take, one take, one take, one take. You knock out like fifteen in an hour or two.”

He's not a fake musician by any means. But I think he'd accept the work he creates for this being described as fake 'art' specifically. There's no thought, meaning, or passion injected into it. It's a conveyor belt. It's based on analytics. It's soulless.

replies(2): >>42472491 #>>42473278 #
1. IncreasePosts ◴[] No.42473278[source]
Mountain ranges and forests are soulless too, but they're still quite special and can be inspiring.