←back to thread

Building Effective "Agents"

(www.anthropic.com)
597 points jascha_eng | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.209s | source
Show context
jascha_eng ◴[] No.42470556[source]
I put the agents in quotes because anthropic actually talks more about what they call "workflows". And imo this is where the real value of LLMs currently lies, workflow automation.

They also say that using LangChain and other frameworks is mostly unnecessary and does more harm than good. They instead argue to use some simple patterns, directly on the API level. Not dis-similar to the old-school Gang of Four software engineering patterns.

Really like this post as a guidance for how to actually build useful tools with LLMs. Keep it simple, stupid.

replies(5): >>42472766 #>>42475610 #>>42475996 #>>42478651 #>>42478930 #
1. curious_cat_163 ◴[] No.42472766[source]
Indeed. Very clarifying.

I would just posit that they do make a distinction between workflows and agents