←back to thread

152 points rbanffy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.207s | source
Show context
addaon ◴[] No.42472268[source]
Are there a lot of missing overbars in this article, or some other typographic marker for antiquarks? I assume the hexaquark descriptions early on are supposed to be (using Q for q-overbar) "QQQqqq or qqqqqq", where it reads to me as "qqqqqq or qqqqqq".
replies(2): >>42472388 #>>42473073 #
1. cwillu ◴[] No.42472388[source]
“Other manifestly exotic hadrons followed, with two exotic hadrons Tcccc(6600) and Tcccc(6900) observed by LHCb, CMS and ATLAS in the J/ψJ/ψ spectrum. They can be interpreted as a tetraquark made of two charm and two anti-charm quarks – a fully charmed tetraquark.”

Not sure if it was deliberate or not, but yeah.