←back to thread

556 points greenie_beans | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
DoingIsLearning ◴[] No.42468831[source]
If you are a Spotify user please make an active effort to seek and listen to artists _albums_. Playlist are a worse experience (unless you make them) and only play into Spotify's pocket.

A few key points with albums:

- You are listening to the artists vision/journey. The songs are not played in isolation but as part of a collective arrangement.

- Artists get payed more per play than individual songs.

- Albums don't degrade like playlists which can be changed by users or spotify to inject some newer commercial push.

replies(5): >>42468924 #>>42468939 #>>42471035 #>>42472351 #>>42475499 #
Kiro ◴[] No.42468939[source]
> - You are listening to the artists vision/journey. The songs are not played in isolation but as part of a collective arrangement.

I think this is less of the case nowadays. The latest albums I've listened to have all been just a complication of the artist's latest EPs with a couple of new tracks.

replies(2): >>42469147 #>>42470668 #
thequux ◴[] No.42469147[source]
This tends to be true of mamy of the artists that chart, but less so for indie bands. I see Major Parkinson's Blackbox and Magna Carta Cartel's The Dying Option as two of the best albums of the century so far, for example.
replies(1): >>42469688 #
1. Kiro ◴[] No.42469688[source]
I don't think that's an accurate distinction. I think maybe it has more to do with the genre (e.g. more common in rock and less so in the electronic music that I listen to, where it's mostly EP driven).

If we're talking popularity vs indie, those bands seem pretty mainstream. In my head indie artists that put out single songs on Soundcloud etc don't do albums until they grow big, so pretty much the opposite (more popular = more album focused).