←back to thread

The era of open voice assistants

(www.home-assistant.io)
879 points _Microft | 4 comments | 20 Dec 24 00:29 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
lxe ◴[20 Dec 24 04:42 UTC] No.42468351[source]▶
Here's what I'm looking for in a voice assistant:

- Full privacy: nothing goes to the "cloud"

- Non-shitty microphones and processing: i want to be able to be heard without having to yell, repeat, or correct

- No wake words: it should listen to everything, process it, and understand when it's being addressed. Since everything is private and local, this is now doable

- Conversational: it should understand when I finished talking, have ability to be interrupted, all with low latency

- Non-stupid: it's 2024, and alexa and siri and google are somehow absolutely abysmal at doing even the basics

- Complete: i don't want to use an app to get stuff configured. I want everything to be controlled via voice

replies(5): >>42468394 #>>42468471 #>>42468967 #>>42470013 #>>42471806 #
danparsonson ◴[20 Dec 24 04:55 UTC] No.42468394[source]▶
> No wake words: it should listen to everything, process it, and understand when it's being addressed

Even humans struggle with this one - that's what names are for!

replies(2): >>42468438 #>>42481564 #
antonyt ◴[20 Dec 24 05:07 UTC] No.42468438[source]▶
Yeah, I’m having a hard time imagining how no-wake-word could work in practice.
replies(3): >>42468837 #>>42470838 #>>42473855 #
1. fragmede ◴[20 Dec 24 06:44 UTC] No.42468837[source]▶
after setting up the system, if I say "turn the ceiling lights to 20%", who else would be changing the lights?

But also, post-fix wake word would also be natural if it was recording all the time. "turn on the lights, Google", for instance

replies(2): >>42472751 #>>42476125 #
2. TheCoelacanth ◴[20 Dec 24 17:04 UTC] No.42472751[source]▶
Someone in a TV show that you're watching?
replies(1): >>42479383 #
3. danparsonson ◴[20 Dec 24 23:21 UTC] No.42476125[source]▶
Sure, if the system is set up to only respond to very specific commands that humans would not respond to, I guess that could work. I was thinking more about the other way around, where a person might speak to someone else in the room and be overheard and acted upon - "turn on the lights!" could be a command for the computer controlling the room, or the human standing next to the Christmas tree, for example.
4. joshstrange ◴[21 Dec 24 12:53 UTC] No.42479383[source]▶
I’ve never had Alexa control a device via a TV show’ audio but playing back a video of me testing my home automation (“Alex, do X”) triggered my lights.

I’d love a no-wake-word world where something locally was always chewing on what you said but I’m not sure how well it would work in practice.

I think it would only take 1-2 instances of it hearing “Hey, who turned off the lights?” in a show turning off my lights for real (and scaring the crap out of me). Doctor Who isn’t particularly scary but if I was watching Silence in the Library and that line turned off my lights I’d be spoked and it would take me a hot minute to realize what happened.